Below is an essay on "Professor" from Anti Essays, your source for research papers, essays, and term paper examples.
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Summary: Legislation enforcing marriage of opposite sex would diminish the evolution of society, alter freedom of choice, as well as, violate equality principles.
"I want to make it clear that extending recognition to non-traditional relationships is not an attempt to undermine the family, but is rather an effort to recognize today's realities and to end discrimination. When we talk about extending benefits we should be looking at relationships and dependency instead of exclusively sexual criteria to define those relationships. ..." (Cambell...)
There is an on going dispute pertaining to the legalization of same sex marriages. We must support legislating in order to allow same sex couples the legal capacity to marry. Legislation enforcing marriage of opposite sex would diminish the evolution of society, alter freedom of choice, as well as, violate equality principles.
Evolution of society is declining as we quarrel in regards to the controversy of homosexual marriages. The definition of marriage set in 1886 by an English court is the union of "one man and one woman to the exclusion of all others." (Saskatchewan...) Humanity has obviously progressed and changed, therefore we are in need of an updated definition of marriage, since the Charter and Canadian Human Rights Act evidently states that bigotry on behalf of sexual preference is illegal. Civilization must compromise in order to create peace on earth. In other words, Evolution of society shall only decline if Canadians remain narrow minded. Narrow mindedness perfectly illustrates humanities rejection of one another. Marriage has perceptibly altered through out the past century. To provide overall fairness, parliament must allow homosexual pairs the same variety of relationship acknowledgment as opposite sex couples. Allowing homosexuals the freedom to civilly marry will not damage heterosexual...