Refusal May Mean Mandatory Blood Draw - Research Paper by Rfs626

TOP ESSAY WRITING SERVICES REVIEWS


Rank
Service
General
Prices

1
  • Since 2008
  • Free revisions
  • Money-back guaranty
  • Up to 5% for the first order. Up to 15% for the orders starting from 2nd

from $9.97/pp

visit site

2
  • Since 2009
  • Free title page, revisions
  • Discount policy
  • Satisfaction guarantee
  • More than 100 000 orders delivered

from $9.97/pp

visit site

3
  • Since 2010
  • PhD holding authors only
  • SMS notifications & VIP support
  • Discount policy

from $22/pp

visit site

4
  • Since 2010
  • 24/7 support team
  • More than 500 writers
  • Money-back guaranty
  • Up to 15% discounts

from $9.97/pp

visit site

 

My Account
Anti Essays

Welcome

Anti Essays offers essay examples to help students with their essay writing.

Sign Up

Refusal May Mean Mandatory Blood Draw Essay

Open Document

Below is an essay on "Refusal May Mean Mandatory Blood Draw" from Anti Essays, your source for research papers, essays, and term paper examples.

Refusal May Mean Mandatory Blood Draw


One of America’s most committed and deadliest crimes is impaired driving. All states and districts have established the blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of .08 as the limit. In 2010 10,228 people died in traffic crashes in which at least one driver was at or over the legal limit (Traffic Safety Marketing, 2010, p. 1). In efforts to save more lives on our public highways the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has been working alongside state and local governments, as well as, numerous nonprofit research organizations by providing grant money to study the effects of impaired driving and help to establish harsher laws. A study currently be conducted, and is implemented in some states, is the “No Refusal” program, which encourages the impaired driver to submit a breath alcohol test or breathalyzer in lieu of a mandatory blood draw. This program is being welcomed and opposed at all levels of government.
The U. S. Supreme Court decided blood could be drawn in the DWI case of Schmerber v. California in 1966. In 1985 U.S. Supreme Court Justice Skinner noted in Winston v. Lee “the drawing of blood constitutes only a minimally intrusive search. Blood tests do not infringe significant privacy interest.” In 1995 two Department of Public Safety (DPS) Troopers in Arizona were certified in phlebotomy. A Texas police officer in 2002 successfully used a search warrant to retrieve blood in a DWI case. By 2005 city law enforcement of Dalworthington Gardens, TX became the first to only request blood through warrants. The No Refusal program was created in 2006. The No Refusal program was implemented by 2007, not only in Texas, but eight other states including Arizona, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, and Utah. The first grants for the program was awarded by the Texas Department of Transportation in 2009. The U.S. DOT and NHTSA as of 2010 have endorsed No Refusal and...

Show More


Related Essays

Citations

MLA Citation

"Refusal May Mean Mandatory Blood Draw". Anti Essays. 20 Nov. 2017

<http://anties.wressy.com/free-essays/Refusal-May-Mean-Mandatory-Blood-Draw-424147.html>

APA Citation

Refusal May Mean Mandatory Blood Draw. Anti Essays. Retrieved November 20, 2017, from the World Wide Web: http://anties.wressy.com/free-essays/Refusal-May-Mean-Mandatory-Blood-Draw-424147.html